As we move into the third year of Covid-19, there have been a growing number of lawsuits and other legal actions in preparation to deal with the pandemic, in a few cases already underway or completed. The mid-April vacating of the federal mask mandate is an example of successful litigation in one of these lawsuits. In the following essay, several legal actions recently initiated are examined, as well as the development of more extensive criminal prosecution, to hopefully bring to justice those who have planned and implemented the Covid pandemic.
Early in March this year, a lawsuit was submitted to Federal District Court in Utah, entitled “Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights and Declaratory and Injunctive Relief“. The Plaintiff is Devan Griner, MD, with Defendants as follows: Joseph R. Biden Jr., United States of America, Xavier Becerra, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, plus Chiquita Brooks-Lasure, Meena Seshamani and Daniel Tsai, all administrators in the above departments.
Dr. Griner is a Plastic Surgeon who has specialized in repair of clef palates and other congenital defects, performing hundreds of such surgeries in Utah. However, due to refusal of Covid-19 gene therapy treatments mandated in Utah, Dr. Griner is now barred from medical practice. A copy of the submitted lawsuit may be found here, with a log of Court actions here.
Dr. David Martin
A driving force behind the Utah litigation for Dr. Griner is bioweapons and patent expert Dr. David Martin. Below is a synopsis of how he became aware of coronavirus issues more than 20 years ago, and how he has been able to help people such as Dr. Griner who believe there is compelling evidence that the Covid-19 outbreak was not accidental.
Martin first addressed patents for bioweapons in the 1990s, as part of his position at University of Virginia Medical School when seeking patents for medical devices. He began to focus research in the area of biological weapons and over several years he served as a consultant to the US government, providing expert witness at congressional hearings, and traveling to over 150 countries in pursuit of information on bioweapons violations. A company he formed contracted with the US Patent Office to redesign archaic and vulnerable aspects of this Office.
In the early 2000s, Martin and his colleagues began examining patents related to research on coronaviruses, becoming aware of the existence of more than 4,000 of them. As they focused on Gain of Function (GOF) patents, Martin recognized a direct relationship between several of them and the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and similar diseases, and how new outbreaks seemed to follow the granting of coronavirus GOF patents.
As an example, the SARS outbreak in 2002-2003 correlated well with GOF patents awarded to Dr. Ralph Baric at UNC-Chapel Hill (research funded by Fauci’s NIAID). Similar correlations were found with the MERS outbreak a decade later. During the 2010s in the US, there began to be moratoria on GOF research, but collaboration was already in place to partner with the Wuhan Institute of Virology laboratory in China. Thus the GOF product we now know as SARS-CoV-2 presents as the result of joint effort. The first reported outbreak (i.e., release of the pathogen) apparently did occur in China in early 2020.
The questions must be raised: why all this interest in coronaviruses? Why all the patents? It would seem that a major reason has been to create the need for medical intervention to protect against the GOF viruses being developed and released. So essentially, (1) create a pathogen with GOF research, (2) release it into the world, and thus (3) create the need for MCMs: Medical Countermeasures, such as the current Covid-19 “vaccines,” which are in no respect traditional vaccines, but rather experimental gene therapy.
Consider the words of Peter Daszak of Eco-Health Alliance in 2015, quoted by Martin:
“…until an infectious crisis is very real, present, and at an emergency threshold, it is often largely ignored. To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis,” he said, “we need to increase public understanding of the need for MCMs such as a pan-influenza or pan-Coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process,” Daszak stated.
Martin points out that this statement is clearly not about healthcare. The conclusion is that the impetus behind the apparently intentional release of SARS-CoV-2 was a very sizeable profit motive. Beyond this, the primary motive has been the attempt on the part of a select handful of global elitists to leverage this manufactured health crisis as a means of grooming citizens for ultimate control by the state. Martin and others point to Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum as an originator of the “Covid Plandemic”. The globalist conspiracy has been hidden in plain view, expressed clearly in Schwab’s book The Great Reset, released in July 2020.
An Early Delineation of Covid Plandemic Criminality
By the time 2021 arrived and the Covid-19 shots were beginning to be applied worldwide, Martin and others had become aware of the tangled web of deception and illegal activity involved in the planning and implementation of the pandemic. Thus, in March 2021, he published an eBook entitled The Fauci/Covid-19 Dossier, in which he defined a total of ten RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) violations committed in the development and release of the original pathogen, and of what he saw as the draconian “countermeasures” taken during the pandemic. This included an outline of Baric’s involvement in his GOF work on coronaviruses, including grant and patent numbers.
A PDF version of The Fauci/Covid-19 Dossier can be found here. The first 26 pages of the 205-page document provide his detailing of the RICO-type crimes he sees as committed in the creation of the pandemic.
Six months later, in a very informative interview, Martin summarizes his view of Covid criminality, as of late 2021. Also, in early 2022, Martin released an Executive Summary of that criminality.
Strategy for the Griner Lawsuit
Even though Martin has identified multiple criminal offenses committed in the preparation and delivery of the Covid plandemic, there have been considerable problems in gaining cooperation from Attorneys General to bring forward Covid lawsuits and indictments for criminal prosecution. This of course applies not only to Martin, but to others who also perceive the criminal implications of the plandemic, and are facing what appears to be widespread judicial corruption.
In the case of the Griner lawsuit, there is a unique law in the State of Utah that Martin believes will move the lawsuit forward. He states this is only the first of several lawsuits that will be issued sequentially. The key is to force the government and corporations to respond to court mandated Discovery orders. Martin suggests that the problem for the defendants is that the Discovery documents will expose illegal activity. With those admitted illegalities, further following lawsuits will be launched demanding additional discovery, etc., perhaps even as far as the US Supreme Court.
Here is a discussion of the strategy with Martin in mid-March 2022, shortly after the lawsuit was submitted to the Utah Federal District Court. And also a lengthy recent article written about the Griner lawsuit, entitled Dr. David Martin’s Lawsuit Against Biden: The COVID Injection is a Bioweapon.
Other Legal Action Exposing Covid Planners
David Martin is not the only one pushing back against the Covid plandemic from a legal standpoint. In fact, perhaps the first salvo was undertaken by former Pfizer VP Dr. Michael Yeadon and others in the UK. On December 6, 2021 they submitted a Criminal Complaint against Covid planners to the International Criminal Court in The Hague. The introductory statement in that Complaint is as follows:
Based on the extensive claims and enclosed documentation, we charge those responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the United Kingdom, but not limited to individuals in these countries.
Here are some of the Perpetrators specified in the Complaint: UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, WHO Director General Tedros Adanhom Ghebreyesys, Bill and Melinda Gates, CEOs of Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, and Johnson and Johnson, President of the Rockefeller Foundation, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) Anthony Fauci, Chairman of the World Economic Forum Klaus Schwab, and President of EcoHealth Alliance Peter Daszack.
The stated Victim(s): THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
The full Complaint can be downloaded here.
Corona Investigative Committee
Undoubtedly the most ambitious project seeking legal action to bring Covid planners to justice is the Corona Investigative Committee, sited in Berlin Germany, but connected worldwide. It has been active in bringing together experts in a variety of disciplines since beginning their efforts in July 2020. They have recorded hundreds of hours of expert testimony from scientists, medical practitioners, historians and lawyers around the world.
In February 2022, they began Phase 1 of their World Grand Jury, with bonafide judges, lawyers, etc. Phase II should begin later this Spring, likely in the US, where there might also be genuine indictments of Covid planners.
“Vaccines” as Bioweapons
A principal issue driving the efforts of the Corona Committee and others to obtain legal remedies to expose and terminate the Covid Plandemic is the unprecedented ominous side effects from the Covid-19 shots. It should be remembered how the “vaccines” appeared on the world scene. In order to get to use them “in warp speed,” they required an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA): the FDA in the US and similar organizations elsewhere had to declare that the Covid-19 pandemic could not be successfully treated by any existing therapeutic. However, the problem was that there were (and are) drugs that have been very successful in treating people becoming sick with Covid-19; especially Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. And further, these drugs have been successfully used for similar diseases over many decades, with minimal adverse side effects.
It should be noted the many who are developing lawsuits and criminal indictments include the EUA decision as essentially a crime against humanity, as untold numbers of people have died and continue to die because these medicines are banned, clearly to support the Covid Plandemic.
Note that because these “vaccines” came into use under the EUA, they were vastly under-tested. Thus, the past 16 months have been a mammoth – although poorly supervised – worldwide test. And the number of deaths and serious diseases from the “vaccines” use is unprecedented. A recent count from the VAERS report states that in the US there have been over 27,000 deaths and more than 1,200,000 adverse events since the beginning of 2021. And multiple studies have indicated that the VAERS system reports anywhere from 10% of the actual events, down to as little as 1%. Regardless, there are more deaths in the US from the Covid-19 “vaccine” than from all other vaccines combined, in all of history. A 9-page list of possible side-effects from the Pfizer shot can be seen here.
Sadly, it is still unknown what the longer-range effects of the shots may be, although there are predictions given in the following links:
A recent interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny highlights potentially irreversible damage done to the human immune system by the shots. There seems no doubt that the “vaccines” were a principal element in the Covid planning. And there does not yet be a definitive answer as to how long the spike proteins will be generated in the body, because there has been manipulation of the human genes, and there was drastically insufficient testing to answer that question.
And here is a webpage containing links to a group of recent interviews with MIT research scientist Stephanie Seneff, wherein she expresses her grave concerns about the suppression of natural immunity caused by the Covid “vaccines”.
Summary
In conclusion, the Griner lawsuit and the ICC Criminal Complaint are early attempts to adjudicate some of what appears to be obvious criminality associated with the Covid Plandemic. In the case of the Griner lawsuit, the desired outcome would be the reinstating of Dr. Griner to resume his valuable practice.
In the UK Criminal Complaint, the focus is toward bringing Covid planners to justice for what is seen as their many violations of the universally applicable Nuremberg codes, with its inherent severe consequences for conviction.
In terms of the Corona Investigative Committee, essentially all of those pursing legal action against the Covid planners such as Dr. David Martin and Dr. Michael Yeadon, as well as others referenced in this article such as Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and Dr. Stephanie Seneff have testified for the Corona Committee one or more times. Additional information about the Committee will be discussed in a subsequent article.