It seems as if everybody has their list of important players in the EC movement. So we have our own! They really need to be separated into the two camps of doctrine-friendly and doctrine-unfriendly. And there is actually a third camp: traditionalists who have achieved prominence in their critique of EC. Clearly in the case of the doctrine-unfriendly, the particular doctrines being revised will vary from one individual to another. Here they are, with a brief profile, followed by a quote that hopefully gives a little flavor of each one’s viewpoint:
Important Players – Doctrine-friendly
Important players – Doctrine-unfriendly
Important players – On the fence: doctrine friendly or unfriendly?
Important players – Traditionalists
Important players – Confused, hopeful
Next.
Leave a Reply